Civil and Administrative Psychological Evaluations
Civil and administrative matters — including personal injury, emotional distress claims, and professional licensing board complaints — call for the same forensic rigor as any criminal evaluation, even though the setting and stakes look different. In these cases, an evaluation often has real consequences for someone's finances, reputation, or ability to work, which makes getting it right especially important.
What This Evaluation Addresses
In personal injury and emotional distress matters, the evaluation addresses the psychological impact of the alleged incident, including diagnosis where appropriate, causation, and the extent of psychological damages. Because civil litigation often involves a financial incentive tied to the reported symptoms, a thorough malingering assessment is a critical part of every evaluation in this context — not an optional add-on, but a core piece of what makes the opinion defensible under scrutiny from the other side.
Professional licensing board complaints present a different but related challenge. These matters frequently involve allegations of criminal conduct, substance abuse, or both, and require the same forensic evaluation skill set used in criminal matters — records review, structured assessment, and an evaluation grounded in evidence rather than the licensee's self-report alone. Because a licensing board matter can directly affect someone's ability to practice their profession and earn a living, the evaluation carries weight well beyond the individual proceeding, and it's crucial to get it right.
Who I Work With
I accept referrals from attorneys representing either side in civil litigation, as well as attorneys representing licensees in professional licensing board matters, across California.
The Evaluation Process
Each evaluation includes a thorough review of relevant records (medical records, prior mental health history, incident-related documentation or board complaint materials, and any prior evaluations), a clinical interview, psychological testing where appropriate, and a malingering assessment, which is a standard part of nearly every evaluation in this context. Collateral interviews are conducted when they would meaningfully inform the opinion. Turnaround depends on the referral question and complexity of the matter — I'm glad to discuss an expected timeline once I understand the specifics of your case.
What You Receive
A thorough, well-organized written report addressing the relevant legal or administrative standard
Availability for pre-report consultation to clarify the referral question or case context
Testimony and deposition availability, as these matters may proceed through civil discovery
Rebuttal review of an opposing expert's evaluation, when appropriate
Why Attorneys Work With Me
I've been qualified as an expert witness in California courts and bring a forensic evaluator's approach — grounded in records review, structured assessment, and malingering analysis — to civil and administrative matters where a great deal is often at stake for the individual involved. Learn more about my background →
If you have a civil or administrative matter where a psychological evaluation is at issue, I'm glad to discuss the referral before you commit to a full evaluation — feel free to reach out to talk through the specifics.
Curious what other attorneys say about working with me? Read my Google reviews →
Want to learn more about civil and administrative forensic evaluation in California? Visit my blog →